Aratina Solar Project by 64NB 8ME LLC (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-KER-25818-R4)

7 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2021020513
Lead Agency
Kern County
Document Title
Aratina Solar Project by 64NB 8ME LLC (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-KER-25818-R4)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/21/2023
Document Description
The Project includes activities related to the construction of a utility-scale photovoltaic (PV) solar generation facility over 2,317 acres and over a generation-intertie (gen-tie) transmission line that will extend approximately 6.5 miles east of the solar generation facility. Activities included in the larger PV solar facility development that will intersect Project streams include the construction of security fences, access roads, PV arrays, operations and maintenance (O&M) buildings, substations, energy storage systems (ESS), and transmission line infrastructure.

Contact Information

Name
Jeremy Pohlman
Agency Name
CDFW
Job Title
Senior Environmental Scientist Specialist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency

Location

Regions
Southern California
Other Location Info
The Project will occur at twenty-two different work areas in streams over a 2,317-acre solar development area and within a transmission line corridor that extends approximately 6.5 miles east of the solar development area, west and south of the communities of Desert Lake and Boron, north and south of State Route 58 between Gephart Road and the Kern – San Bernardino County Line, in Kern County and within the existing northeastern utilities’ corridor of Edwards Air Force Base, in San Bernardino County.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Kern
Final Environmental Document Available at
2700 “M” Street, Suite 100 Bakersfield, California 93301

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Attachments

Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.

Download CSV New Search Print