Avenues Specific Plan
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2018072045
- Lead Agency
- Tracy, City of (City of Tracy)
- Document Title
- Avenues Specific Plan
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The project applicant proposes the Avenue Specific Plan to serve as a comprehensive land use plan for the development of approx 95 acres. The project proposes a residential neighborhood made up of a mix of residential building types and recreational uses. The ASP would allow for a max of 480 dwelling units and a min of 380 units, for a total density of 4-5 dwelling units per gross acre. Future homes within the ASP would be designed consistent with the architectural standards provided in the Avenues SP Pattern book. The main entry into the plan area would be from Valpico Rd onto Summit Dr, the main street through the plan area.
- Contact Information
-
Andrew Malik
City of Tracy
333 Civic Center Plaza
Tracy, CA 95376
209-831-6400
Location
- Coordinates
- 37°42'37"N 121°27'44"W
- Cities
- Tracy
- Counties
- San Joaquin
- Cross Streets
- Valpico Rd
- Zip
- 95376
- Total Acres
- 95
- Parcel #
- 240-140-05, -06
- State Highways
- I-205, 580
- Airports
- Tracy Municipal
- Schools
- Monticello ES
- Waterways
- CA Aqueduct & Delta Mendota Canal
- Township
- 2S
- Range
- 5E
- Section
- 31
- Base
- MD
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- City of Tracy City Council
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 333 Civic Center Plaza, Tracy, CA 95376
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes