Jackson Gate North Plaza Wetland Removal
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2018022062
- Lead Agency
- Amador County
- Document Title
- Jackson Gate North Plaza Wetland Removal
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 9/12/2018
- Present Land Use
- PLU: Vacant; Z: Heavy Commercial; GP: Regional Service Center
- Document Description
- The Central valley Regional Water Quality Control Board is issuing a 401 Water Quality Certification for the subject project. The project includes grading and filling of 0.089 acre of seasonal wetlands and 0.004 acre of intermittent drainage channels to prepare the site for future commercial building. Prior to constructing the pad for the commercial buildings, the to 5 feet of clayey soil will be remved and approximately 6,000 subic yards of firmer soil will be used to fill the wetlands and intermittent drainage channels when they are dry.
- Contact Information
-
Peter Minkel
Regional Water Quality Control Board
11020 Sun Center Dr, #200
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 464-4684
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°22'04"N 120°47'43.2"W
- Cities
- Jackson
- Counties
- Amador
- Cross Streets
- Hwy 49 and Jackson Gate Rd
- Zip
- 95642
- Total Acres
- 0.51
- Parcel #
- 044-030-024, 025, 026
- State Highways
- 49
- Railways
- Amador Central RR
- Airports
- Westover Field
- Schools
- Argonaut HS, Jackson
- Waterways
- Rock Creek
- Township
- 6N
- Range
- 11E
- Section
- 17
- Base
- MDM
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Regional Water Quality Control Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 810 Court Street, Amador County
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No