Permit No. 19513: California State Parks - Great Valley Grasslands Floodplain Restoration Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017121006
Lead Agency
California Department of Parks and Recreation
Document Title
Permit No. 19513: California State Parks - Great Valley Grasslands Floodplain Restoration Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/20/2020
Document Description
Approval of Permit No. 19513, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Article 3, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control: To breach the existing left (southwest) bank levee of the San Joaquin River at three locations and to remove three segments of levee, approximately 644, 2667, 622 feet in length, to re-establish a hydraulic connection with the San Joaquin River as part of the Great Valley Grasslands Floodplain Restoration Project (Project). Removed levee material will be placed within the Project site and native vegetation will be planted where the levee segments were removed.
Contact Information
Name
Itzia Rivera
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
California State Parks
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Merced
Other Location Info
The project is located approximately 1.4 miles west from where State Route 165
(Lander Avenue) crosses the San Joaquin River, within the Great Valley Grasslands State Parks, in Merced County.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes