Ditch Gulch Curve Improvement (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0583-R1)

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016082024
Lead Agency
Caltrans 2 (Redding) (California Department of Transportation, District 2)
Document Title
Ditch Gulch Curve Improvement (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0583-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/26/2018
Present Land Use
Resource Lands

Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0583-R1, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish Game Code to the project Applicant, Caltrans District 2. Permittee is planning to construct a new bridge (approx. 312 feet in length) just north of the existing alignment of hwy 36 which currently is a tight curve crossing Ditch Gulch. After construction of the bridge the existing alignment of the road, culvert, and associated fill will be removed to restore Ditch Gulch to a free flowing condition.

Contact Information
Richard Lis
CDFW
601 Locust St
Redding, CA 96001

Phone : (530) 225-2142

Location

Coordinates
40°25'2.16"N 123°10'41.96"W
Cities
Alturas Hayfork
Counties
Modoc
Cross Streets
SR 36, 3
Zip
96041
Total Acres
14.18
Parcel #
019-060-17-00
State Highways
SR 36, 3
Waterways
Ditch Gulch
Township
30N
Range
12W
Section
26
Base
MDBM

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
601 Locust St., Redding, CA 96001

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search