California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1602 Routine Maintenance Agreement

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016082023
Lead Agency
Caltrans 3 (Marysville) (California Department of Transportation, District 3)
Document Title
California Department of Fish and Wildlife 1602 Routine Maintenance Agreement
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/15/2016
Present Land Use
State ROW, Transportation

Document Description
Caltrans proposes to enter into a long term routine maintenance agreement (RMA) with CDFW, under the Lake and streambed alteration program (1602). This RMA would cover routine maintenance activities occurring within streamzones and adjacent to state of right of way in Butte, Colusa, El Dorado, Glenn, Nevada, Placer, Sacramento, Sierra, Sutter, Yolo and Yuba Counties. Routine maintenance activities include, but are not limited to: the removal of sand, silt, sediment, debris, woody and herbaceous vegetation and other obstructions to flow; the control of weeds, grasses, and emergent vegetation; making repairs and improvements to control erosion and stabilize banks; repairing and/or replacing gates, barricades, culverts and small structures; the repair and/or replacement of existing structures, cleaning and clearing of facilities; and creation of temporary access routes.

Contact Information
Ken Russo
California Department of Transportation, District 3
703 B St
Marysville, CA 95901

Phone : (530) 741-4291

Location

Counties
Butte Colusa El Dorado Glenn Nevada Placer Sacramento
Waterways
all waterways within CDFW Region 2 jurisdiction

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Caltrans
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
703 B Street, Marysville, CA 95901

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search