Shasta Water Management Project
5 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016062043
Lead Agency
Resource Conservation District of Tehama County
(RCD-TC)
Document Title
Shasta Water Management Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/29/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has renewed and amended Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2001-0562-R1, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Jack Roggenbuck. The project consists of ongoing operation and maintenance of HVR as described in the Site Plan Agreement. Project activities include operation of surface water diversions from the Shasta River and pond springs adjacent to the Shasta River (diversion numbers 160 and 161 and the upslope spring); diversion facility maintenance; wet stream crossing use and maintenance; fish screen maintenance; and implementation of beneficial management activities carried out by Permittee to benefit coho salmon including operation of improved water diversion and water temperature management infrastructure.
Contact Information
Name
Brad Henderson
Agency Name
Fish and Wildlife, Region 1
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Jack Roggenbuck
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
Tehama
Regions
Northern California
Waterways
Shasta River
Other Location Info
The project is located at Hidden Valley Ranch (HVR) on the Shasta River and
nearby springs, in the County of Siskiyou, State of California along Big Springs Road in central Siskiyou County (41°34'57” N latitude, 122°26'18" W longitude)
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No