Shasta Water Management Project
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016062043
- Lead Agency
- Tehama County, Resource Conservation District of (Resource Conservation District of Tehama County)
- Document Title
- Shasta Water Management Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 10/29/2020
- Project Applicant
- Jack Roggenbuck
- Document Description
- The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has renewed and amended Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2001-0562-R1, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Jack Roggenbuck. The project consists of ongoing operation and maintenance of HVR as described in the Site Plan Agreement. Project activities include operation of surface water diversions from the Shasta River and pond springs adjacent to the Shasta River (diversion numbers 160 and 161 and the upslope spring); diversion facility maintenance; wet stream crossing use and maintenance; fish screen maintenance; and implementation of beneficial management activities carried out by Permittee to benefit coho salmon including operation of improved water diversion and water temperature management infrastructure.
- Contact Information
-
Brad Henderson
Fish and Wildlife, Region 1
601 Locust Street
Redding, CA 96001
Phone : (530) 225-2362
brad.henderson@wildlife.ca.gov
Location
- Counties
- Tehama
- Regions
- Northern California
- Waterways
- Shasta River
- Other Location Info
- The project is located at Hidden Valley Ranch (HVR) on the Shasta River and nearby springs, in the County of Siskiyou, State of California along Big Springs Road in central Siskiyou County (41°34'57” N latitude, 122°26'18" W longitude)
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- SVRCD
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No