Cypress Self Storage (General Plan Amendment 03-15, Rezone 05-16, and Design Review 12-15)
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016032070
Lead Agency
City of Oakley
Document Title
Cypress Self Storage (General Plan Amendment 03-15, Rezone 05-16, and Design Review 12-15)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/29/2016
Present Land Use
Abandoned orchard and house
Z: M-12 (Multi family Residential) District
GP: Multi family residential (High Density)
Document Description
Approval of: 1) a General Plan Amendment to amend the land use designation from Multi Family Residential (High Density) to Commercial; 2) a Rezone from M-12 (Multi Family Residential) District to P-1 (Planned Unit Development) District; and 3) Design Review (Development Plan) for new development of a 139,408 s.f. self storage facility (up to 3 stories tall) with a 1,024 sf office building on a 3.29 acre vacant lot located on the southern side of the East Cypress Road and Picasso Drive intersection. The site is zoned M-12 (Multifamily Residential) District. APN 033-012-004.
Contact Information
Name
Ken Strelo
Agency Name
City of Oakley
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Oakley
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
East Cypress Rd and Picasso Dr
Zip
94561
Total Acres
3.29
Parcel #
033-012-004
Railways
BNSF
Schools
OUESD, LUHSD
Waterways
Sacramento/San Joaquin River Delta
Township
2N
Range
3E
Section
30
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Oakley
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.