Stock Drive Realignment Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1060-2016-0052-R6)

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016012066
Lead Agency
Mono County
Document Title
Stock Drive Realignment Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1060-2016-0052-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
CDFW is executing Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0052-R6, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the Permittee, the Mono County Dept. of Public Works, represented by Mr. Garett Higerd. The project includes the realignment of 575 feet fo existing roadway. The Streambed Alteration Agreement is being issued to address 0.005 acres of temporary impacts to the Aurora Ditch resulting from the excavation and replacement of the existing culvert (project). The project includes: the removal of the existing 42-inch-high, 60-in-wide pipe; the removal of less than three cubic yards of accumulated organic sediment from the areas adjacent the pipe; the replacement of the culvert pipe with an in-pipe; the placement of a precast headwall and concrete slurry and backfill around the new culvert; and re-pavement of Stock Drive. Surface flows will not be encountered during project activities, and the project will not occur during nesting season.

Contact Information
Heidi Calvert
CDFW
3602 Inland Empire Blvd. Suite C-220
Ontario, CA 91764

760-872-0751

Location

Coordinates
38°15'29.7"N 119°13'29.1"W
Counties
Mono
Cross Streets
Court St and Stock Dr
Zip
93517
Total Acres
2
Parcel #
008111011000
State Highways
182
Airports
Bryant Field
Schools
Bridgeport ES
Waterways
East Walker River
Township
5N
Range
25E
Section
28
Base
MtDiablo
Other Location Info
Bridgeport

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220, Ontario, CA 91764

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search