Hass Water Diversion and Stream Crossing Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0397-R1)

236 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Hass Water Diversion and Stream Crossing Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0397-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0397-R1, pursuant Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to Mr. Jade Hass. Project is limited to 9 encroachments. Encroachment 1 is for water diversion from a spring hydrologically connected to South Fork Eel River. Existing diversion infrastructure is an 18-diameter by 24-inch deep concrete cistern. The existing cistern will be replaced with a 12" diameter by 24" deep cistern. Water is diverted for domestic use only. Work for the water diversion will include replacement, use and maintenance of the water diversion infrastructure. Water is not diverted from existing ponds on the property. A well was disclosed as the source of irrigation water. The remaining eight encroachments are to upgrade failing and undersized culverts, and install a new culvert. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, removal of the failing culverts, replacement with new properly sized culverts, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.

Contact Information
Angela Liebenberg
CDFW
619 Second St.
Eureka, CA 95501

707-964-4830

Location

Counties
Humboldt
Other Location Info
Dinsmore

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
619 Second St., Eureka, CA 95501

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search