Honchar Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0151-R1)

SCH Number: 2015102005
Lead Agency: Humboldt County
Document Title: Honchar Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0151-R1)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 9/27/2019
Posted: 9/27/2019
Project Applicant: Humboldt County Dept. of Planning and Building

Document Description: The project is limited to three encroachments (Table 1 ). One encroachment is for removing an onstream impoundment. Two other proposed encroachments are to upgrade failing and undersized stream crossings. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, removal of the failing crossings, replacement with new properly sized crossings, backfilling and compaction of fill , and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.

Contact Information: Cheri Sanville
Department of Fish and Wildlife
619 Second Street
Eureka, CA 95501
Phone : (707) 441-5901

Counties: Humboldt
Other Location Info: The project to be completed is located within the Lower Eel River watershed, approximately 2.98 miles SW of the town of Dinsmore, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 20, T01 , R05, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Larabee Valley U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Humboldt County Assessor's Parcel Number 210-231-017; latitude 40.4510 N and longitude -123.6288 W at the first stream crossing.

Final Environmental Document Available at: The mitigated negative declaration prepared for the project is available to the general public at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. CDFWs record related to the Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement is available to the public for review at CDFWs regional office.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No