Haynes Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0619-R1)

SCH Number: 2015102005
Lead Agency: Humboldt County
Document Title: Haynes Water Diversion and Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0619-R1)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 5/17/2019

Document Description: The project is limited to seven encroachments. One encroachment is for water diversion from and unnamed tributary to the Van Duzen River Creek. Water is diverted for domestic use and irrigation. Work for the water diversion will include use and maintenance of the water diversion infrastructure. The six other proposed encroachments are to upgrade failing and undersized culverts. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, removal of the failing culverts, replacement with new properly sized culverts, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.

Contact Information: Greg O'Connell
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
619 Second Street
Eureka, CA 95501
7074415790

Cities: Dinsmore
Counties: Humboldt
Other Location Info: The project to be completed is located within the Van-Duzen River watershed, approximately 1.5 miles SW of the town of Dinsmore, County of Humboldt, State of California. The project is located in Section 08, T01 N, ROSE, Humboldt Base and Meridian; in the Larabee Valley U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Humboldt County Assessor's Parcel Number 210-221-011; latitude 40.4743 N and longitude 123.6290 W at the point of diversion.

Approving Agency: CDFW
Approving Agency Role: Responsible Agency
Approved On: 5/17/2019
Final EIR Available Location: Humboldt County Dept. of Planning and Building 3015 H Street Eureka, CA 95501

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No