Iliev Crossings Project ( Lake or Streambed Alterations Agreement No. 1600-2018-0086-R1)

SCH Number: 2015102005
Lead Agency: Humboldt County
Document Title: Iliev Crossings Project ( Lake or Streambed Alterations Agreement No. 1600-2018-0086-R1)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 2/26/2019
Posted: 2/26/2019
Present Land Use: The project applies across all land use designations

Document Description: The project is limited to 6 encroachments. One encroachment is for installation of a mimumum 18 inch culvert to connect a cut bank seep to a class III watercourse. A second encroachment is to replace a failing and undersized 24 inch culvert with a minimum 30 inch culvert. A third encroachment is to replace a failing and undersized 18 inch culvert with a minimum 30 inch culvert. A fourth encroachment is to replace an undersized 12 inch culvert with a minimum 18 inch culvert. A fifth encroachment is to replace a gang of triple barreled 12 inch, 12 inch and 18 inch culverts with a minimum 30 inch culvert. A sixth encroachment is to install a minimum 18 inch culver in order to re-unite a class II water course that is currently intercepted by an inside ditch to its original channel. *SEE NOD FOR FULL DETAILS

Contact Information: Timothy Smith
CDFW, Northern Region
619 Second St
Eureka, CA 95501
Phone : (707) 441-2091

Coordinates: 40.1517°'"N 124.0512°'"W
Counties: Humboldt
Parcel #: 220-061-026, 220-061-027
Waterways: Eel River
Township: 3S
Range: 1E
Section: 34
Base: HB&M
Other Location Info: town of Briceland
Other Information: in the Briceland, U.S. Geological survery 7.5 minute quadrangle

Final Environmental Document Available at: 619 Second Street, Eureka, CA 95501

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No