Georgiev Diversion, Crossing, and Stream Restoration Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0097-R1)
809 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015102005
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
Georgiev Diversion, Crossing, and Stream Restoration Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0097-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/11/2019
Present Land Use
The project applies across all land use designations
Document Description
The project is limited to 4 encroachments. One encroachment is for water diversion from an in ground 30 inch by 8 feet deep concrete cistern that passively collects shallow subsurface ground seep or spring water. Water is diverted to storage for domestic household and irrigation use. A second encroachment is to replace a shot funned failing 12 inch culvert with a minimum 18 inch culvert. A third encroachments is to upgrade a dirt ford crossing to a rocked ford crossing. A fourth encroachment is to remove perched fill that was placed within the banks of a Class III watercourse. Work for the crossing encroachment will include excavation, removal of the failing culverts, replacement with new properly sixed culverts, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
Contact Information
Name
Cheri Sanville
Agency Name
CDFW, Northern Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Humboldt
Parcel #
108-024-011
Waterways
Mattole River
Township
3S
Range
1E
Section
33
Base
HB&M
Other Location Info
town of Miranda
Other Information
in the Honeydew U.S. Geological survery 7.5 minute quadrangle
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.