Georgiev Diversion, Crossing, and Stream Restoration Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0097-R1)
196 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2015102005
- Lead Agency
- Humboldt County
- Document Title
- Georgiev Diversion, Crossing, and Stream Restoration Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0097-R1)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The project is limited to 4 encroachments. One encroachment is for water diversion from an in ground 30 inch by 8 feet deep concrete cistern that passively collects shallow subsurface ground seep or spring water. Water is diverted to storage for domestic household and irrigation use. A second encroachment is to replace a shot funned failing 12 inch culvert with a minimum 18 inch culvert. A third encroachments is to upgrade a dirt ford crossing to a rocked ford crossing. A fourth encroachment is to remove perched fill that was placed within the banks of a Class III watercourse. Work for the crossing encroachment will include excavation, removal of the failing culverts, replacement with new properly sixed culverts, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion.
- Contact Information
-
Cheri Sanville
CDFW, Northern Region
619 Second St
Eureka, CA 95501
707-441-5902
Location
- Coordinates
- 40.1547°'"N 124.0783°'"W
- Counties
- Humboldt
- Parcel #
- 108-024-011
- Waterways
- Mattole River
- Township
- 3S
- Range
- 1E
- Section
- 33
- Base
- HB&M
- Other Location Info
- town of Miranda
- Other Information
- in the Honeydew U.S. Geological survery 7.5 minute quadrangle
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 619 Second Street, Eureka, CA 95501
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No