Lakeview Pipeline Repair Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2015061016
Lead Agency
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Document Title
Lakeview Pipeline Repair Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/14/2015
Present Land Use
Various
Document Description
The proposed project would reline the existing Lakeview Pipeline (LVP) with a steel pipe liner. To gain access to the inside of the LVP and install the liner, access sites would be established at a max of 23 locations along the LVP alignment. Within the access sites, the pipeline would be excavated, sections of the existing pipeline removed, and the liner inserted and pushed through the pipeline in segments. Additional components include relocating the pipeline's underground air release vacuum valves to ground level and upgrading the pipeline's electrical connections. The project would also install an approximately 1,000 lf pipeline interconnection between the LVP and the Perris Bypass Pipeline at Metropolitan's Lake Perris Pressure Control Structure Facility.
Contact Information
Name
Alex Marks
Agency Name
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
San Jacinto
Counties
Riverside
Cross Streets
Lakeview Avenue, Ramona Expressway, Warren Road
Parcel #
Various
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
San Jacinto River
Other Location Info
Lakeview
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Metropolitan Water District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.