Huntington Beach Energy Project - Petition to Amend

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2014091014
Lead Agency
City of Los Angeles
Document Title
Huntington Beach Energy Project - Petition to Amend
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/13/2017
Present Land Use
R2-1 / Low Medium I Residential
Document Description
On June 27, 2012 AES Southland, LLC submitted an Application for Certification (AFC) for the Huntington Beach Energy Project (HBEP). On Oct. 29, 2014, the Energy Commission approved the AFC for HBEP with a Final Decision. On Sept. 14, 2015, AES Southland LLC submitted a petition to amend (PTA) to the Energy Commission to modify the Final Decision. HBEP, as amended (12-AFC-02C), would replace, and be constructed on, 28.6 acres entirely within the footprint of the existing and operating AES Huntington Beach Generating Station (HBGS) located in an industrial area of Huntington Beach, CA. The redesigned project would total 844 megwatts and be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 would be a natural gas-fired, combined cycle, air cooled, 644 MW electrical generating facility. Phase 2 would be two 100-MW simple-cycle gas turbines. No new offsite linear facilities are proposed as part of this project.

Contact Information

Name
John Heiser
Agency Name
CA Energy Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
East Pershing Drive + Culver Blvd
Zip
90230
Other Location Info
Westchester - Playa Del Rey

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CA Energy Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print