Richmond Wet Weather Storage Project

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013102013
Lead Agency
City of Richmond
Document Title
Richmond Wet Weather Storage Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/1/2014
Present Land Use
Z: CS and RM GP: Commercial Service; Residential Medium Density
Document Description
In compliance with the 2008 settlement agreement between the City of Richmond, Veolia and San Francisco Baykeeper, the City of Richmond proposes to construct improvements to its sewer collection system to reduce wet weather overflows from two engineered overflow structures, known as Boat Ramp and Harbour & Wright. Proposed improvements include construction of a new diversion box, pump station, pipeline, and an above ground concrete tank with storage volume of approximately 150 feet in diameter and approximately 53 feet tall. Water Pollution Control Plant effluent will be used to supply water to the wash down system to clean the tank.

Contact Information

Name
Chad Davisson
Agency Name
City of Richmond
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Richmond
Counties
Contra Costa
Cross Streets
601 Canal Boulevard in the City of Richmond, Contra Costa County, CA
Parcel #
560-330-011, 556-110-003
State Highways
I-580
Railways
Burlington N. Santa Fe
Airports
No
Schools
Washington ES
Waterways
SF Bay

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
City of Richmond
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print