Designation of Combined-Use Road to Establish the Eastern Sierra Adventure Trail System Pursuant to AB 628

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013101039
Lead Agency
Inyo County
Document Title
Designation of Combined-Use Road to Establish the Eastern Sierra Adventure Trail System Pursuant to AB 628
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The Adventure Trails System of the Eastern Sierra, LLC. (Applicant) submitted an application packet containing 38 separate combined-use applications for the proposed ATV Adventure Trails of the Eastern Sierra Project (Project) to Inyo County on October 12, 2012. Each application was filed in accordance with both AB 628 and the Implementing Procedures, which allow for such a pilot project. Several applications were revised in response to County and public agency comments on June 21, 2013. The application packet requested the County of Inyo to undertake a project to designate, until January 1, 2017, several combined-use routes up to 10 miles long on certain unincorporated County roads; and it requested the City of Bishop to undertake a project to designate several combined-se routes of up to 3 miles long on certain roads maintained by the City of Bishop.

Contact Information
Courtney Smith
Inyo County
P.O. Drawer Q
Independence, CA 93526

760-878-0207
csmith@inyocounty.us

Location

Cities
Bishop
Counties
Inyo
Regions
County-wide
Parcel #
Numerous
State Highways
US 395, SR 168
Airports
Bishop
Other Location Info
Big Pine, Independence, Lone Pine

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Inyo County Board of Supervisors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
Inyo County Public Works Department, 168 N. Edwards Street, Independence, CA

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search