Aera 03062645

631 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2013081079
Lead Agency
Kern County
Document Title
Aera 03062645
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The originally approved project consists of an amendment to Title 19 Kern County Zoning Ordinance (July 2012), with focus on Ch. 19.98 (Oil and Gas Production), to include new site development standards for all oil and gas exploration, extraction, operations, and production activities in unincorporated Kern County. DOGGR, as the Responsible Agency, will be issuing a permit for the proposed project activity, which consists of the following: Aera Energy LLC (Aera) proposes to hydraulically fracture 1 well which is expected to take 3 days, or less, including placement of portable tanks and all ancillary equipment to support the closed loop system, as well as the well stimulation treatments (WST). The well is in a densely developed oilfield (South Belridge) and drilling commence in 2017. As such, there will be no new ground disturbance or expansion of existing facilities associated with this project. Fluids from the WST will be collected in a closed system and will not be discharged onto the ground or into sumps. Well Name 54423-29 API# 03062645

Contact Information
Meri Meraz
Dept. of Conservation
801 K Street, MS 18-05
Sacramento, CA 95814

916-445-9686

Location

Counties
Kern
Zip
93560
Total Acres
3110 sq mi
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
Hwy 99, 58, 43, 46, 119, 223, 20
Railways
Multiple
Airports
Multiple
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
Kern River
Other Location Info
Multiple

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DOGGR
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
http://pcd.kerndsa.com/oil-gas-zoning-amendment

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search