Iny-168 Culvert Extension Project (SAA 1600-2012-0098-R6)
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012091023
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 9
Document Title
Iny-168 Culvert Extension Project (SAA 1600-2012-0098-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/26/2012
Present Land Use
State Highway
Document Description
CDFG is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 (SAA #1600-2012-0098-R6) of the Fish and Game to the project Permittee, California Department of Transportation, District 9. The Permittee proposes conduct project activities at five locations along a half-mile stretch of SR 168 to obtain a minimum of 20-feet Clear Recovery Zone on each shoulder of the highway. Proposed project activities include the extension of four existing culverts, construction of new headwalls at both the inlet and outlet at all four locations; placement of structural backfill material, road shoulder paving, tree removal, and relocation of two existing irrigation channels.
Contact Information
Name
Tammy Branston
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Bishop
Counties
Inyo
Cross Streets
Otey Road and SR 168
Zip
93514
Total Acres
.33
Parcel #
None
State Highways
Hwy 168
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
Jill Kilmont Boothe
Waterways
Four unnamed irrigation channels/two with water
Township
7S
Range
32E
Section
9
Base
MDB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.