SR-20 Salt Creek Scour Repair Project (1600-2013-0187-R2)

13 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2012072021
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Document Title
SR-20 Salt Creek Scour Repair Project (1600-2013-0187-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/21/2013
Present Land Use
Various (urban and rural)
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife is executing Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2013-0187-R2, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The project site is Salt Creek Bridge (Caltrans Bridge Number 15-0022) on State Route (SR) 20, a conventional two-lane highway, crossing the ephemeral Salt Creek near the two of Williams in Colusa County. Work would install RSP over filter fabric. Before RSP has been installed, contour grading would excavate enough parent soil to result in the optimum streambed profile to maintain water conveyance. A tangle of vegetation would be removed from the northern, upstream portion of the work site. Utilities are present but would not require relocation. A staging area is available within the existing right of way, and access to the site may require a temporary construction easement in an adjacent parcel at the southeast quadrant of the site.

Contact Information

Name
Tim Nosal
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Butte, Colusa, Glenn
Cross Streets
Various
State Highways
Hwy 5, 20, 32, 149, 162
Waterways
Creeks: Big Chico, Clear, Salt, Lurline, Hunter

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print