Draft Supplement No. 2 to the FEIR for the San Clemente Dam Seismic Safety Project (OCRD Removal)
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2012071036
Lead Agency
California State Coastal Conservancy
(SCC)
Document Title
Draft Supplement No. 2 to the FEIR for the San Clemente Dam Seismic Safety Project (OCRD Removal)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/8/2012
Present Land Use
Conservation, permanent grazing, mountain
Document Description
Alternative 3 in the San Clemente Dam Seismic Safety EIR/EIS was revised by CAW to improve benefits to fish passage and sediment transport. Similar to Alternative 3 in the FEIR/EIS, the revised project involves removing San Clemente Dam and rerouting the Carmel River. In addition, Old Carmel River Dam (OCRD) will be removed rather than notched. CDWR prepared a Supplement to the EIR (SEIR #2005091148) that addressed all other project changes but did not address removal of OCRD. SEIR No. 2 describes the removal of OCRD, analyzes potential impacts, and proposes mitigation.
Contact Information
Name
Trish Chapman
Agency Name
California State Coastal Conservancy
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Monterey
Cross Streets
San Clemente Drive
Zip
93940
Total Acres
0.6
State Highways
Carmel Valley Road
Waterways
Carmel River
Township
17S
Range
2E
Section
24
Base
MD B&M
Other Location Info
Carmel Valley Village
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Coastal Conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.