Tujunga Spreading Grounds Intake Improvement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0038-R5)

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2012021028
Lead Agency
City of Los Angeles
Document Title
Tujunga Spreading Grounds Intake Improvement Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0038-R5)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/15/2017
Present Land Use
LU: Stormwater basins Z: OS-1XL, Open Space (City of LA) GPLU: Open Space
Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2016-0038-R5, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Los Angeles County Flood Control District. Project is limited to the constructing two new sets of diversion gates (proposed as diversion gates Number (No.) 2 and 3 and corresponding intake structures at each gate within Tujunga Wash Channel. the purpose of the project is to increase the intake capacity of the Tujunga spreading grounds by increasing volume of surface water diverted by approx. 4,000 acre feet resulting in annual average amount diverted around 12,200 acre feet of surface water from Tujunga Wash and Pacoima Diversion Channel.

Contact Information

Name
Matt Chirdon
Agency Name
CDFW
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Van Nuys
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
Roscoe Blvd & Sheldon St.
Zip
91352
Total Acres
160
State Highways
I-5, Hwy 170
Schools
J.H. Francis Polytechnic H.S.
Waterways
Tujunga Wash, Pacoima Wash
Township
2N
Range
15W
Base
SBB&M
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Sun Valley, Pacoima

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print