Environmental Assessment 2011-0006
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2011092032
Lead Agency
Yuba County
Document Title
Environmental Assessment 2011-0006
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/1/2012
Present Land Use
Transportation Facility
Document Description
Yuba County Public Works Department is seeking environmental approval to replace the existing at-grade intersection of Feather River Boulevard at SR-70. The proposed interchange will consist of a compact diamond layout for southbound movements and L-9 partial-cloverleaf for northbound movements on SR-70 approximately 0.40 miles (0.64km) north of the Bear River in Yuba County. The interchange will include a five-lane overcrossing of SR-70, five interchange ramps, and removal of the existing Feather River Boulevard at-grade intersection and traffic signal. The project limits are approximately 4,400 feet northerly from the Bear River Bridge on SR-70, and 2,100 feet easterly from River Oaks Boulevard to Chalice Creek Drive (east of SR-70).
Contact Information
Name
Kevin Perkins
Agency Name
Yuba County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Yuba
Cross Streets
SR 70 and Feather River Blvd
State Highways
SR 70
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Plumas Lake USD
Waterways
Bear River
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Plumas Lake
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Yuba County Staff Development Committee
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.