Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0001-R6)

10 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010121069
Lead Agency
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Document Title
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0001-R6)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Project is proposing the construction of a new light rail transit bridge over the existing San Antonio concrete channel. The bridge will be comprised of precast concrete girders set at each end on top of a cap beam supported by cast-in-drilled-hole (CIDH) piles. The bottom of the precast concrete girders will be set a minimum of three feet above the existing channel walls. The cap beam and CIDH piles are designed so that no additional structural stress to the existing channel will occur as a result of construction and the new bridge. Existing fencing on top of the channel walls will be removed and new fencing will be connected to the existing fencing, will temporarily impact a total of 0.02 acres (100 feet in width by 100 feet in length) of Fish and Game Code Section 1602 resources during construction and 0.03 acres of permanent impacts (50 feet in width by 25 feet in length) due to shading effects from the new bridge installation.

Contact Information
Kim Romich
CDFW
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., suite C-220
Ontario, CA 91764

909-980-3818

Location

Cities
Montclair
Counties
San Bernardino Los Angeles
State Highways
I-210, SR 57, US 66, I-10
Railways
Metrolink, BNSF
Other Location Info
Montclair

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Suite C-220, Ontario, CA 91764

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search