Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0287-R5)

10 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2010121069
Lead Agency
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority
Document Title
Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project Phase 2B (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0287-R5)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
CDFW is intending to execute a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code (#1600-2017-0287-R5) to the project applicant, Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority. The project involves extending the Metro Gold Line approx. 12.3 miles from Azusa to Montclair. To accommodate the new light rail transit (LRT) tracks, bridges that span various waterways along the alignment will widened. The project would modify, replace, or relocate existing freight rail transit (FRT) bridges that span Big Dalton Wash, San Dimas Wash, Marshall Canyon Channel, Live Oak Wash and Thompson Creek Wash in order to accommodate the dual track LRT. The project proposes to impact 0.06 acres of streambed/lake including 0.06 acres of permanent impact to cement channel due to shading.

Contact Information
Brock Warmuth
CDFW
3883 Ruffin Road
San Diego, CA 92123

858-467-4201

Location

Cities
San Dimas Pomona La Verne Glendora Claremont Azusa, Glendora, San Dimas, La Verne, Pomona, Claremont, ... Azusa
Counties
San Bernardino Los Angeles
State Highways
I-210, SR 57, US 66, I-10
Railways
Metrolink, BNSF

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
3883 Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA 92123

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search