Summit Reservoir Replacement Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2010072060
Lead Agency
East Bay Municipal Utility District
(EBMUD)
Document Title
Summit Reservoir Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/14/2011
Present Land Use
PLU: single family residential
Document Description
The Summit Reservoir Replacement Project entails demolition of a 37-million gallon (MG) open-cut reservoir and roof system and decommissioning of the Woods and Shasta Pumping Plants located below the southwestern reservoir embankment. Construction includes a new 3.5-MG, partially buried concrete tank, replacement pumping plants and a new Summit flow control valve within a new structure, and replacements of the water distribution pipelines and drainage facilities on the site. The project would remove portions of the dam embankments to ensure that the remaining basin would be below the California Division of Safety of Dams' jurisdictional size. The entire reservoir basin would be re-graded and landscaped with a mixture of drought-tolerant grasses and shrubs interspersed with trees.
Contact Information
Name
Robyn Mutobe
Agency Name
East Bay Municipal Utility District, Office of the Secretary
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Berkeley
Counties
Alameda, Contra Costa
Regions
Unincorporated
Cross Streets
416 Spruce Street, Berkeley; bordered by Grizzly Peak Boulevard to the east
Zip
94708
Total Acres
17
Parcel #
Various
State Highways
I-80 / I-580
Railways
No
Airports
No
Schools
Step One Nursery School; Cragmont ES
Waterways
Cerrito Creek / Wildcat Creek
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Kensington
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
East Bay Municipal Utility District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.