San Diego Shipyard Environmental Restoration Fund - BAE (North)
9 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2009111098
Lead Agency
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 9
Document Title
San Diego Shipyard Environmental Restoration Fund - BAE (North)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/25/2013
Present Land Use
Industrial/San Diego Unified Port District
Document Description
The Shipyard Sediment Remediation Project is the dredging of the sediment adjacent to shipyards in San Diego Bay; the dewatering, solidification of the dredged material (onshore or on the barge); the potential treatment of decanted water (anticipated disposal to the sanitary sewer); and the transport of the removed material to an appropriate landfill for disposal. The State Lands Commission action is a five-year Dredging Lease through June 20, 2018, is for the dredging of a 105,000 cubic yards of contaminated sediment in the north shipyard area (W26666).
Contact Information
Name
Donn Oetzel
Agency Name
CA State Lands Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
West of Sampson Street & Harbor Drive
Zip
92113
Total Acres
17.5
State Highways
I-5
Railways
SD&AE RR, BNSF RR
Airports
San Diego International
Schools
Perkins Elementary
Waterways
San Diego Bay
Township
17S
Range
3W
Base
SBB&M
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CA State Lands Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.