State Route 99 Corridor Bikeway Project (Capital Project #50166)

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009092041
Lead Agency
Chico, City of (City of Chico)
Document Title
State Route 99 Corridor Bikeway Project (Capital Project #50166)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
The portion of the proposed project within the vicinity of Little Chico Creek is the installation of a clear-span bridge associated with the construction of the State Route 99 Corridor Bikeway Facility. The bridge and new bike path extending south would connect to existing bicycle facilities located on the north side of Little Chico Creek. The proposed clear-s[an bridge would extend 70 feet between two abutments placed on the north and south sides of the creek, outside of the active stream channel. Installation of the clear-span bridge would require trimming of vegetation within the creek channel for safety and clearance; however no trees would be removed. Some shrubs and groundcover (mostly Himalayan lackberry) within the riparian area would also be removed to accommodate the southerly approach.

Contact Information
Gary L. Hobgood
Department of Fish and Game
North Central Region 1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670

916-983-6920

Location

Cities
Chico
Counties
Butte
Cross Streets
paralleling SR 99 form Eaton Rd south to Southgate Ave
Zip
various
Total Acres
6.7 lineal miles
Parcel #
various
State Highways
SR 99, SR 32
Airports
Chico Municipal
Schools
Neal Dow, Hooker Oak
Waterways
Lindo Channel, Big Chico Creek, Little Chico Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
City of Chino Municipal Bldg 411 Main St. 2nd Floor Chico, CA 95928

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search