Consider Approval of a Lease Amendment Between the City of Eureka and the Trustees of the California State University Involving Granted Sovereign Land Pursuant

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2009022055
Lead Agency
California State University, Humboldt
Document Title
Consider Approval of a Lease Amendment Between the City of Eureka and the Trustees of the California State University Involving Granted Sovereign Land Pursuant
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/29/2009
Document Description
Authorize the following determinations, required by Chapter 1086, Statutes of 1970, as applying to the lease amendment between the City of Eureka and the Trustees of the California State University; on file in the principal office of the Commission and by reference made a part hereof: a) that said lease amendment is in accordance with the terms of the grant under which title to the lands in question are held by the City of Eureka; b) that said lease amendment is in the best interest of the state pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 2, Section 2802.

Contact Information

Name
Paul D. Thayer
Agency Name
California State Lands Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Eureka
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Waterfront Drive, between K and J Streets
Zip
95501
Total Acres
1.16
Parcel #
001-161-016 and 001-161-017
State Highways
101, 255
Airports
Murray Field Airport
Schools
Peninsula Union School
Waterways
Humboldt Bay
Township
5N
Range
1W
Section
22
Base
HB&M

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California State Lands Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print