Restoration of a Section of the Upper San Diego Ditch and Abandonment of a 1974 Flume

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2008092015
Lead Agency
Tuolumne Utilities District
Document Title
Restoration of a Section of the Upper San Diego Ditch and Abandonment of a 1974 Flume
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/21/2008
Present Land Use
Homestead Residential, Public / HR, P
Document Description
An existing wooden flume on the Tuolumne Utilities District's Upper San Diego Ditch is in disrepair and leaking significantly. TUD proposes to abandon the flume and restore the flows along the route of a previously abandoned section of the ditch. The restoration will consist of guniting approx. 80ft. the ditch and installing approx. 112ft. of 24" diameter pipe which will circumvent around the northwest side of the flume. The existing flume is wooden, approx. 113ft. in length and was constructed by PG&E in 1974. TUD proposes to dismantle and remove the entire flume. A walking trail passes through the area, which will be reestablished after restoration. Construction access will be through the College property and down a roughed-in road from the observatory. Construction time will be 1-2 weeks and is anticipated to start towards the end of fall in 2008. The District will use its own workforce to complete the project.

Contact Information

Name
Kelly Stuart Klyn
Agency Name
Tuolumne Utilities District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Tuolumne
Cross Streets
Sawmill Flat Road, Columbia College Drive
Zip
95310
Total Acres
0.25
Parcel #
032-260-32 & -33 / 032-150-77
State Highways
Hwy 49
Airports
Columbia
Schools
Col. College & Elem.
Waterways
Woods Creek
Township
2N
Range
14E
Section
13
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
Columbia State Park

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Tuolumne Utilities District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print