Dry Creek/West Placer Community Plan - Transportation Element Update (PEIR T20070805)
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2007122051
Lead Agency
Placer County
Document Title
Dry Creek/West Placer Community Plan - Transportation Element Update (PEIR T20070805)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/11/2011
Present Land Use
General Plan: Low Density Residential (1-2 dwellings per acre), Medium Density Residential (4-6 dwellings per acre), Commercial, and Agriculture.
Zoning: Residential Single Family (RS) and Agriculture combining a 20,000 square foot minimum (AG-B-20).
Document Description
NOTE: Final EIR with 1 CD
As a part of the Transportation Element Update, the Placer County Department of Public Works proposes to keep PFE Road open and to construct speed reduction treatments on PFE Road and Cook-Riolo Road to preserve the rural character of the Community Plan area. The County would also review the Community Plan's transportation goals and policies for relevance to today's community environment and to ensure applicability in the future.
Contact Information
Name
Maywan Krach
Agency Name
County of Placer
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Roseville
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
PFE Road and Cook Riolo Road
Zip
95747
Total Acres
27.3
State Highways
I-80
Railways
Southern Pacific
Airports
Pruett
Schools
Dry Creek Elementary School
Waterways
Dry Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Placer County
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.