Mather Airport Master Plan (Revised 2013)

7 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2007102040
Lead Agency
Sacramento County
Document Title
Mather Airport Master Plan (Revised 2013)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Note: NOD filed on August 18, 2014 has been retracted. On August 26, 2014, the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors rescinded their August 12, 2014 approval of the project. The proposed project is the Mather Airport (MHR) Master Plan. The Master Plan establishes a program for modifications of existing facilities and development of new facilities and MHR through the year 2035. The Master Plan provides flexible recommendations for facilities and phasing of projects that will accommodate users and tenants. Recognizing uncertainties associated with long-range aviation demand forecasts, two planning activity levels (PALs) were identified to represent future levels of activity at which key airside and landside improvements would be triggered. For the Master Plan, PAL 1 corresponds to near-term (2018) activity and PAL 2 corresponds to long-term (2035) activity forecast. The purpose of the Revised Mather Airport Master Plan is to guide airport development over a 20-year period. The entire Revised Mather Airport Master Plan can be viewed at: http://www.sacramento.aero/scas/about/planning_design/

Contact Information
Catherine Hack
Sacramento County
827 Seventh Street, Room 225
Sacramento, CA 95814

916-874-7914

Location

Cities
Rancho Cordova
Counties
Sacramento
Cross Streets
Mather Boulevard
Total Acres
2253
State Highways
Hwy 50
Airports
Mather
Waterways
American River

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
County of Sacramento
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
N/A

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search