06-KER-14 KP 73.9/100.2 (PM 45.9/62.3) Freeman Gulch Four-Lane Project
8 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2006121082
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans 6 (Fresno) (California Department of Transportation, District 6)
- Document Title
- 06-KER-14 KP 73.9/100.2 (PM 45.9/62.3) Freeman Gulch Four-Lane Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 11/5/2007
- Present Land Use
- Mainly open space desert (Bureau of Land Management). Z: Estate, Limited Agriculture, Medium Industrial.
- Document Description
- Caltrans proposes to convert the existing two-lane conventional highway into a four-lane, divided, controlled-access expressway. Proposed improvements on the existing roadway include placing an asphalt concrete overlay, flattening cut slopes, widening fill slopes, widening paved shoulders, and installing a median and inside/outside paved shoulders. The project also would require constructing a new Freeman Gulch Bridge, widening or replacing the existing Freeman Gulch Bridge and upgrading intersections.
- Contact Information
-
Sarah Gassner
Department of Transportation, District 6
2015 E. Shields Avenue, Suite 100
Fresno, CA 93726-5428
Phone : (559) 243-8243
Location
- Cities
- Ridgecrest
- Counties
- Kern
- Cross Streets
- SR-14 / Redrock Inyokern Road
- Zip
- 93527
- State Highways
- 14
- Waterways
- Little Dixie Wash, Sage Canyon Wash, Freeman Gulch Wash, and two unnamed
- Other Location Info
- City/Nearest Community: Inyokern
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Caltrans
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- Caltrans, District 6, 2015 E. Shields Ave., Suite 100, Fresno, CA 93726
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No