Grantline 220 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0260-R2)
12 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2006072067
- Lead Agency
- Rancho Cordova, City of (City of Rancho Cordova)
- Document Title
- Grantline 220 (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0260-R2)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 12/7/2018
- Present Land Use
- Agricultural; AG-80 and AG-20; SunCreek-Preserve Planning Area
- Document Description
- CDFW has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2018-0260-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Grantline & Chrysanthy investors, LLC, as represented by Angelo Christie. The proposed project includes the development of a residential community and associated infrastructure within a 220-acre property. The site will be developed for the creation of approximately 135.8 acres of single-family residential housing, 53.2 acres of commercial lots, 7.5 acres of parks, 10 acres for a school, 6.1 acres of drainage corridor, 8.3 acres of detention basin, and associated infrastructure for the development of the parcel. The project includes the following components: mass grading of the project site and a detention basin with an associated outfall structure.
- Contact Information
-
Dylan Wood
CDFW. North Central Region
1701 Nimbus Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 358-2384
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°32'43"N 121°11'49.154"W
- Cities
- Rancho Cordova
- Counties
- Sacramento
- Total Acres
- 1200
- Parcel #
- 067-0040-010
- Waterways
- Kite Creek, Laguna Creek
- Township
- 8N
- Range
- 7E
- Section
- 15
- Base
- MDB&M
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 1701 Nimbus Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes