Permit No. 19380: Tidewater Crossing Outfall Project
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2005122101
- Lead Agency
- Stockton, City of (City of Stockton)
- Document Title
- Permit No. 19380: Tidewater Crossing Outfall Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 10/23/2020
- Project Applicant
- Armoto Partners LLC
- Document Description
- Approval of Permit No.19380, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Article 3, Section 6 for work within an adopted plan of flood control to construct a storm-water outfall structure in the Littlejohns Creek-South Branch. The project also includes excavation of approximately 78 cubic yards of soil from the bed and banks of the Littlejohns Creek-South Branch to install approximately 78 cubic yards of clean rock slope protection in the bed and banks of the creek.
- Contact Information
-
Jennifer Stewart
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821
Phone : (916) 574-1719
jennifer.stewart@cvflood.ca.gov
Location
- Counties
- San Joaquin
- Other Location Info
- The project is located southwest of Stockton Metropolitan Airport, 1.9 miles west of State Route 99, and 0.8 mile northeast of East French Camp Road, in San Joaquin County.
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Flood Protection Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- The environmental document is available to the general public at the lead agency's office. The Board's administrative record of proceedings related to the encroachment permit is available for public review at the Board's office. Please note, the NOD is not attached. If you would like to request a signed copy of the NOD, please contact Board staff at: questions@cvflood.ca.gov.
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes