Channel Water Quality Improvement Project
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005082021
Lead Agency
City of Stockton
Document Title
Channel Water Quality Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/9/2006
Present Land Use
Commercial/Waterway/Marina
Z: n/a / CD - Commercial Downtown / IG - Industrial General
GP: n/a / Commercial / HDR - High Density Residential
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game is executing a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2005-0294-R2 pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, City of Stockton, Municipal Utilities Department.
The City of Stockton proposes to construct a bubble plume destratification system within the Stockton Channel. The destratification system consists of a series of forced air diffuser laterals space approximately 550 feet apart to vertically destratify the length of the Stockton Channel stretching from the east end of McLeod Lake to the I-5 overcrossing.
Contact Information
Name
Gary L. Hobgood
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Stockton
Counties
San Joaquin
Cross Streets
I-5 to Center Street
Zip
95203
Total Acres
43
Parcel #
137-010-03, 06, 07, 08; 137-410-08
State Highways
I-5, Hwy. 4
Railways
BNSF
Schools
Weber Institute, Model Alternative School, Urbani Charter, Pittm
Waterways
Stockton Channel
Township
1N
Range
6E
Section
3
Other Information
Schools: Pittman ES, Hazelton ES
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.