South Region High School #2
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2005041105
Lead Agency
Los Angeles Unified School District
Document Title
South Region High School #2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/26/2006
Present Land Use
Single Family, Multi-Family, Commercial / R-S, M-1 / Medium Density Residential and Industrial
Document Description
NOTE: Reference SCH# 2007121174
The proposed South Region High School No. 2 project entails the acquisition of 71 parcels; vacation of streets and alleys; construction and operation of an educational facility; and potential joint use of Bethune Park. The proposed high school campus would include 75 classrooms, administration rooms, a multi-purpose room/cafeteria, food services area, lunch shelter, library, playfields, gymnasium, and subterranean parking. The school would provide 2,025 two-semester seats for grades 9 through 12 and an assumed event adult school program of approximately 450 seats. The proposed high school site would also be available for community uses during non-school hours.
Contact Information
Name
Stan Yeh
Agency Name
Los Angeles Unified School District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, City of
Counties
Los Angeles
Regions
Unincorporated
Cross Streets
East 61st Street, Central Avenue, Gage Avenue, Naomi Avenue, Hooper Avenue
Zip
90001
Total Acres
16
Parcel #
6008-013, 014, 015, 016
State Highways
I-110
Railways
UPRR and BMSF
Other Location Info
City/Nearest Community: Florence-Firestone
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Los Angeles Unified School District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.