Application to Appropriate Water No. 31074
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004092109
Lead Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Document Title
Application to Appropriate Water No. 31074
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/16/2005
Present Land Use
Farmland & Resident/Agriculture
Document Description
The Applicant proposes to divert a total of 49 acre-feet per annum, during the period of December 31 to March 31, from an unnamed stream tributary to Miner's Ravine thence Dry Creek Natomas Main Drainage Canal thence Sacramento River, in Placer County. The water would be diverted to storage in an existing offstream reservoir at a diversion rate not to exceed 0.2 cubic feet per second. Water stored in the reservoir would be used for stockwatering up to 100 head of cattle and irrigation of up to 81 acres of pasture and 12 acres of nursery plants. The total place of use for the water would consist of 93 acres within a 240 acre parcel known as Broken Arrow Ranch.
Contact Information
Name
Ross Swenerton
Agency Name
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Rocklin
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
Cavitt-Stallman Road and Cavitt Road
Total Acres
93
Parcel #
046-050-002-510
State Highways
I-80
Waterways
Miner's Ravine and Boardman Canal
Township
11N
Range
7E
Section
28
Base
MDB&M
Other Location Info
Granite Bay
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Rights
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.