Former Honey Lake Demolition Range: East Shore Area Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis -- Sierra Army Depot.

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2004032056
Lead Agency
California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
Document Title
Former Honey Lake Demolition Range: East Shore Area Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis -- Sierra Army Depot.
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/9/2004
Present Land Use
Military Facility
Document Description
The project consists of a surface and subsurface clearance ordinance and explosives related materials to a minimum depth of 12 inches below ground surface over an area of approximately 984 acres. Signs warning of the potential hazards associated with the site and land use controls are also included as part of the proposed remedy. Investigative activities are likely to uncover items that contain explosive residues. Items that are safe to move will be collected and stored in a temporary explosives storage magazine. At the end of the project all items that have been collected will be transported to an approved off-site treatment/disposal facility. Items that are deemed unsafe to move will be detonated in place.

Contact Information

Name
John Harris
Agency Name
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Lassen
Total Acres
1000
Railways
Union Pacific
Airports
Amedee Airfield (military)
Waterways
Honey Lake
Township
28 N
Range
16 E
Section
20
Other Location Info
Sierra Army Depot, Herlong, CA

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Department of Toxic Substances Control
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print