Interstate 80 Freeway Improvement Project

7 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2004022041
Lead Agency
Caltrans 3 (Marysville) (California Department of Transportation, District 3)
Document Title
Interstate 80 Freeway Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/23/2008
Present Land Use
Freeway/Transportation

Document Description
Caltrans proposes to address current recurring peak period congestion as well as more prolonged future congestion by adding capacity in each direction on mainline I-80 from 1.1 kilometers (0.70mi.) west of the Sacramento/Placer Co. line to approx. 1.56 kilometers (0.97mi.) east of SR 65 connector in Placer Co. This agreement pertains to Interstate 80 Freeway Improvement Project activities within the stream zone of Miners Ravine and unnamed tributaries to Secret Ravine. Specifically, the Interstate 80 Bridge over Miner Ravine will be widened. Additional bridge footings will be installed at Miners Ravine. Three culverts will be extended at three existing culverts at three tributaries to Secret Ravine.

Contact Information
Gary Hobgood
Dept. of Fish and Game
1701 Nimbus Road, Suite A
Sacramento, CA 95670

Phone : (916) 983-6920

Location

Cities
Citrus Heights Rocklin Roseville
Counties
Placer Sacramento
Cross Streets
I-80 Between Riverside Blvd. to east of State Route 65
Total Acres
26
State Highways
80, 65
Railways
Union Pacific
Waterways
Cirby Creek, Linda Creek, Miners Ravine, and Dry Creek
Section
Multi.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Dept. of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
2389 Gateway Oak Dr. Sacramento, CA 95833

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search