Interstate 80 Freeway Improvement Project
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2004022041
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Document Title
Interstate 80 Freeway Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/23/2008
Present Land Use
Freeway/Transportation
Document Description
Caltrans proposes to address current recurring peak period congestion as well as more prolonged future congestion by adding capacity in each direction on mainline I-80 from 1.1 kilometers (0.70mi.) west of the Sacramento/Placer Co. line to approx. 1.56 kilometers (0.97mi.) east of SR 65 connector in Placer Co. This agreement pertains to Interstate 80 Freeway Improvement Project activities within the stream zone of Miners Ravine and unnamed tributaries to Secret Ravine. Specifically, the Interstate 80 Bridge over Miner Ravine will be widened. Additional bridge footings will be installed at Miners Ravine. Three culverts will be extended at three existing culverts at three tributaries to Secret Ravine.
Contact Information
Name
Gary Hobgood
Agency Name
Dept. of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Citrus Heights, Rocklin, Roseville
Counties
Placer, Sacramento
Cross Streets
I-80 Between Riverside Blvd. to east of State Route 65
Total Acres
26
State Highways
80, 65
Railways
Union Pacific
Waterways
Cirby Creek, Linda Creek, Miners Ravine, and Dry Creek
Section
Multi.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Dept. of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.