Mission Creek Restoration Project

3 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2003022050
Lead Agency
Alameda County
Document Title
Mission Creek Restoration Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/5/2003
Document Description
The project reach extends from Palm Avenue crossing to Driscoll Road crossing. Mission Creek has a watershed of 5.4 square miles and is the primary drainage in the City of Fremont. Project components include the removal of vegetation, construction of a stable channel bed and banks, using bio-engineering methods for bank stabilization, creek meander restoration, creation and enhancement of bed morphologic diversity (e.g. ponds, riffles, etc.), and extensive riparian re-vegetation. The purposes of the restoration project are to reduce erosion and downstream sedimentation within the Laguna Creek watershed, restore and extend a native riparian corridor, increase environmental awaremess in the community, and provide educational opportunities for students.

Contact Information

Name
Mr. Kwablah Attiogbe
Agency Name
Alameda County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Fremont
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Driscoll Road/Mission Blvd.
Zip
94536
Total Acres
8
State Highways
262, I-680
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Fremont Unified School
Waterways
Mission Creek, Lake Elizabeth, Laguna Creek
Township
4S
Range
1W
Section
35

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Alameda County Board of Supervisors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print