Grading Permit
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002081016
Lead Agency
San Benito County
Document Title
Grading Permit
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/15/2002
Present Land Use
Homesite-ranchette, Agricultural Productive zoning with 5 acre min.
Document Description
The applicant is proposing to reclaim a gravel and rock mining site for agricultural use. The 6.39 acre site, situated adjacent to the San Benito River, was mined for gravel and left as a 12-foot deep gravel pit. The mining operation left the property surrounded on the river boundary by a levee at 280+ foot elevation. The proposal is to reclaim the site by refilling with approximately 73,000 cubic yards of fill material to a depth of between 10 and 12 feet within the confines of the existing levee. The end use proposed for the property is to be as horse stables and pasture for the owner's use. The property is develoed with a single-family residence located on the levee near the southern property boundary.
Contact Information
Name
Rob Mendiola
Agency Name
San Benito County Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Hollister
Counties
San Benito
Cross Streets
Nash/Riverside Roads
Total Acres
6.39
Parcel #
21-08-24
State Highways
156
Schools
Hollister Union
Waterways
San Benito River
Township
13S
Range
5E
Section
Hollis
Base
MTDIABLO
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Benito County Planning Department
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.