DR01-21/S01-29 (Cameron Park East Shopping Center)
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002042108
Lead Agency
El Dorado County
Document Title
DR01-21/S01-29 (Cameron Park East Shopping Center)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/13/2002
Present Land Use
Planned Commercial - Community Design Review (CP-DC)/Commercial (C)
Document Description
Design Review for 6 commercial buildings on 5 parcels as follows: 53,165 sf retail grocery/food market on 4.33 acres; 5,600 sf comercial retail building on 0.60 acre; 2,800 sf comercial building with drive-through window on 0.68 acre; 2,100 sf comercial building with drive-through window on 0.70 acre; and 6,000 sf commercial/restaurant building and a 16,800 sf commercial retail building on 3.47 acres. The special use permit would allow one freestanding pole sign with a maximum overall height of 60 feet with 4 tenant sign panels and a project name panel (total sign area equals 365.5 sf); and 2 monument signs, each 15 feet tall with a total of 7 sign panels totaling 95.4 sf.
Contact Information
Name
Roger Evans
Agency Name
El Dorado County Planning Department
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
El Dorado
Cross Streets
Cameron Park Drive
Zip
95682
Total Acres
9.8
Parcel #
109-201-01; -02; -03; -04, 109-250-01
State Highways
50
Township
9N
Range
9E
Section
3
Base
MDBM
Other Location Info
Cameron Park
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
EDC Planning Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.