WesPac Pipelines Ltd.'s Jet Fuel Storage Tank Project - Tenth Avenue Bunker Fuel Facility
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2002021078
Lead Agency
San Diego, Port of
Document Title
WesPac Pipelines Ltd.'s Jet Fuel Storage Tank Project - Tenth Avenue Bunker Fuel Facility
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/10/2002
Present Land Use
Marine Related Industrial/Port Master Plan
Document Description
A Negative Declaration was prepared evaluating the potential environmental impacts of the reconfiguration and expansion of the existing Tenth Avenue Bunker Fuel Facility. The project proposes to demolish one 25 ft. diameter storage tank, relocate one 25 ft. diameter storage tank, relocate one 60 ft. diameter storage tank, and install one new 95 ft. diameter jet fuel storage tank, thus increasing WesPac's jet fuel storage tank capacity at the Tenth Avenue Marine Terminal (TAMT) from 87,750 to 147,750 barrels. The jet fuel would be delivered to the Lindbergh Field tank farm via the existing San Diego Internatioal Airport Pipeline (pipeline). The Negative Declaration identified no potential impacts resulting from the proposed project.
Contact Information
Name
Melissa Mailander
Agency Name
San Diego Unified Port District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
San Diego
Counties
San Diego
Cross Streets
East Harbor Drive/8th Avenue
Zip
92101
Total Acres
3.13
Parcel #
020-012
State Highways
I-5
Railways
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Schools
Perkins Elementary
Waterways
San Diego Bay
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
San Diego Unified Port District
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.