Dannon Natural Spring Water Bottling Facility
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001082005
Lead Agency
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 5 (Central Valley), Redding
Document Title
Dannon Natural Spring Water Bottling Facility
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/15/2002
Present Land Use
Industrial. Zoning: M-H General Plan: Woodland Productivity/Disturbed Soils.
Document Description
Danone Waters of North America (Dannon) has filed a Report of Waste Discharge (RWD) for the on-site discharge of bottle rinsewater to a proposed leach field with the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. The water bottling facility began operating in January 2001, and is currently bottling natural spring water for sale in regional markets throughout the western United States.
In addition to proposing the construction and operation of a new on-site leach field, Dannon is proposing the addition of a third water bottling production line to the facility some time in the near future, depending on regional market conditions and consumer demand for bottled spring water.
Contact Information
Name
Dennis Wilson
Agency Name
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region 5 (Redding)
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Mount Shasta
Counties
Siskiyou
Cross Streets
Ski Village Dr., Mt. Shasta Blvd.
Zip
96067
Total Acres
250
Parcel #
37-140-010
State Highways
Interstate 5
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Mt. Shasta High School
Waterways
Big Spring Creek
Township
40N
Range
4W
Section
94
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.