State Route 4 -Alpine County Tree Removal
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2001062014
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 10
Document Title
State Route 4 -Alpine County Tree Removal
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/13/2001
Present Land Use
Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest/Zoned Open-space (O-S)
Document Description
The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) in cooperation with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest is proposing to remove approximately 100 hazardous trees that are within 1.5 meters (5 feet) or less of traveled way on State Route (SR) 4 in Alpine County. For the purpose of this project, Caltrans has adopted the tree removal criteria used by the USFS. The removal criteria are discussed in the Tree Hazards: Recognition and Reduction in Recreation Sites handbook, USFS 1981. Many of the trees are currently damaged or dying and/or are close enough to the road that they pose a potential safety hazard to the traveling public.
Contact Information
Name
Ann Dow
Agency Name
Department of Transportation, District 10
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Alpine
Cross Streets
State Route 4 and State Route 89
Zip
96120
State Highways
89, 4
Waterways
East Fork Carson River
Township
7N
Range
19E
Section
VAR
Other Location Info
City: Markleeville
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 10
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.