Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Union City Community Redevelopment Project (the "Amended Redevelopment Plan")
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2000112010
Lead Agency
Union City
Document Title
Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Union City Community Redevelopment Project (the "Amended Redevelopment Plan")
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/18/2002
Present Land Use
Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Public, Open Space
Document Description
The project provides an east-west pedestrian underpass crossing underneath the BART and the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) trackways, connecting the BART intermodal station with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) property, which is to be redeveloped as part of the Amended and Restated Redevelopment Plan for the Union City Community Redevelopment Project. The proposes Pedestrian Grade Separation crosses 157.5 feet north of the existing BART station building. Pedestrians access the underpass from an intermodal plaza on the west side of BART and a series of stairs and ADA-accessible ramps on the east side of UPRR underpass. Preliminary underpass dimensions are 12-feet high by 30-feet wide.
Contact Information
Name
Mark Evanoff
Agency Name
California Transportation Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Union City
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
Whipple Road/Mission Boulevard/Alvarado-Niles/Union City Boulevard
Total Acres
1,658
State Highways
I-880
Waterways
Alameda Creek/Dry Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Union City
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.