Coyote Valley Research Park Planned Development Rezoning
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1999092031
Lead Agency
City of San Jose
Document Title
Coyote Valley Research Park Planned Development Rezoning
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/19/2001
Present Land Use
Agriculture/A-Agriculture A (PD) to allow campus industrial uses/Non-Urban Hillside Campus Industrial.
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Game (DFG) is executing a lake and streambed alteration agreement R3-2000-1041 pursuant to section 1603 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, David A. Taran. The applicant proposes to develop approximately 400 acres of a 688 acre site, with up to 6.6 million square feet of buildings for office, research and development, assembly, light manufacturing, associated infrastructure, parking, and new internal roadways. The project includes the construction of 5 new bridges and widening of an existing bridge and box culvert over Fischer Creek, 5 new storm drain outfalls, 2 improved existing outfalls, a new by-pass channel, and a flood detention basin.
Contact Information
Name
Greg Martinelli
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Cities
San Jose
Counties
Santa Clara
Cross Streets
Bailey Avenue/Santa Teresa Boulevard
Total Acres
688
Parcel #
708-25-001,002;708-26-001,002;708-27-001,007,012,013;708-28-002;708-30-008,011,012
State Highways
101
Railways
Union Pacific
Schools
Encinal School
Waterways
Coyote Creek, Fisher Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.