Santa Ana River Mainstream Improvement Projects: Prado Basin and Vicinity, Including Reach 9 and Stabilization of the Bluff Toe at Norco Bluffs
23 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1997071087
Lead Agency
United States Army, Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE)
Document Title
Santa Ana River Mainstream Improvement Projects: Prado Basin and Vicinity, Including Reach 9 and Stabilization of the Bluff Toe at Norco Bluffs
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/25/2002
Present Land Use
Open space, Agricultural, Residential Single Family, Miscellaneous leases in Prado Basin.
Document Description
The proposed project is to provide flood protection to areas susceptible to floods ranging from 100-year to 190-year frequencies within San Bernardino, Riverside and Orange Counties. The project features include Norco Bluffs toe stabilization, structural improvements within Prado Dam and Basin, and flood control improvements downstream of Prado Dam in Reach 9 of the Santa Ana River. The project will result in impacts to lease Bell's vireo and southwestern willow flycatcher, which are protected under the California Endangered Species Act, requiring issuance of a California Incidental Take Permit ("Permit").
Contact Information
Name
Leslie MacNair
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Game
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Anaheim, Corona, Norco, Yorba Linda
Counties
Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino
State Highways
71, 91, 15
Railways
Metrolink, AT&SF
Airports
Corona Municipal
Waterways
Santa Ana River
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department of Fish and Game
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.